MANOJ KUMAR JAIN S/O SHRI LAXMINARAYAN JAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/4381/2025 · 2025-09-23
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36725 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36725 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:39271] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4381/2025 Manoj Kumar Jain S/o Shri Laxminarayan Jain, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Near Jain Mandir, Laxmangarh, Dist. Alwar (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anurag Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 23/09/2025
1. Petitioner-complainant has invoked the inherent and extraordinary jurisdiction of High Court under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking directions for expeditious disposal of Criminal Case No.39/2018 titled as ‘State Vs. Rajat Gupta’ pending before the Court of learned Additional Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate No.11, Jaipur Metropolitan-I, Jaipur at the stage of pre-charge evidence.
2. Counsel for petitioner pointed out that the present criminal case is pending since 04.10.2019 at the stage of pre-charge evidence and no further proceedings have commenced due to which the legal and constitutional right of petitioner to have a speedy trial of criminal cases enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is being infringed and jeopardized.
3. Ordinarily, in the criminal matters, directions to decide the criminal case in stipulated time are not required to be passed,
[2025:RJ-JP:39271] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4381/2025] however, in the present case, it has transpired that the proceedings of present criminal case has not commenced further and proceedings are stuck at the stage of pre-charge evidence since 04.10.2019, hence, it is hereby directed that the trial Court shall proceed in the matter in accordance with law expeditiously.
4. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of.
5. All pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
6. A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court, for compliance.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Mohita/Ronak/65