Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36724 (JHR)

M/S MAA TARA CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT CO, REPRESENTED THRO ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY RAJESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY

WPC/5438/2025 · 2025-10-31

Arun Kumar Rai, Sujit Narayan Prasad

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:32687-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.5438 of 2025 ------ M/s Maa Tara Construction and Equipment Co, a partnership firm, having it’s office at A.R., Mansion, West Layout Sonari, East Singhbhum, Jharkhand, and Sankosai, Dimna Road, P.O. & P.S.- Mango, East Singhbhum, Jharkhand-831012 Represented through its Authorized Signatory-Rajesh Kumar, aged about 54 years, S/o Late Lakshmeshwar Prasad Sinha, R/o Village-Genrara, P.O.-Udiya Chirundih, P.S.-Kamalpru (Patamda), District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Govt. of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, Ranchi-834002 2. The Director of Mines, Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, Ranchi-834002 3. The District Mining Officer, P.O., P.S., & District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand-833219 4. The Deputy Commissioner, P.O., P.S., & District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand-833219 ..... .... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kr. Das, Advocate Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advocate For the State : Mr. Srikant Swaroop, AC to AAG-II ------ 02/Dated: 31.10.2025 1. Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at the outset, has submitted that the authorities have passed the order on the pending representation and as such, he intends not to press the instant writ petition. However, he has sought for liberty to challenge the decision so taken by the authority dated 21.10.2025. 2. There is no opposition on the part of the learned State Counsel. 2025:JHHC:32687-DB 2 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order dated 21.10.2025 by approaching the appropriate forum. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 31.10.2025 Rohit/-