Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36720 (AP)

Y.Srikanth v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/28701/2018 · 2025-07-15

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010602582018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28701/2018 Between: 1. Y.SRIKANTH, S/O LATE Y. SRIHARI, AGE 34 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SRI SAI HOMES, FLAT NO.218, MADAHAVIPURIHILLS, PJR ENCLAVE, ROAD NO.5, CHANDANAGAR, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, M.R.PALLI POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. KAKINADA THATHAJI CH CHOWDARAIAH, S/O THIMMANAYADU, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O 2-13-10/14, VENKATA NAGAR, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SUBASH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of 4th respondent in conducting the investigation in Crime No.174 of 2018, dated 09-06- 2 2018, on the file of 4th respondent, with regard to the complaint lodged by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, unjust, colourable exercise of powers, contrary to the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code and contrary to the judgment of the Honourable Apex Court and consequently direct the 4th respondent to investigate the matter in Crime No.174 of 2018, dated 09-06-2018, on the file of 4th respondent and file charge sheet.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the crime covered by this writ petition was investigated into and the same was referred as ‘false’ vide R.C.No.367/Refer/SDPO-TPT(W)/2018 dated 31.10.2018 by the-then Sub- Divisional Police Officer, Tirupati West Division, Tirupati. Hence, no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed. 3. Sri P.Subhash, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.07.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.28701 of 2018 Dt.16.07.2025 Dinesh