Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36718 (PNJ)

SUMAN AND ANOTHER v. VINAY PRATAP SINGH, EXCISE AND TAXATION COMMISSIONER

COCP/1435/2025 · 2025-04-03

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (101) COCP-1435-2025 (O&M) Date of decision:- 03.04.2025 Suman and another ...Petitioners Versus Vinay Pratap Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. … SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 10 read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging violation of order dated 25.02.2025, Annexure P-1, passed by the Writ Court in CWP-5344-2025. 2. At the outset, counsel for the petitioners states that the instant petition has become infructuous, as the respondent has complied with order, Annexure P-1. 3. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 4. Pending application is disposed off. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 03.04.2025 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.04.03 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment