Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36710 (RAJ)

RAMZAN KHAN CHEETA S/O LATE ALADIN CHEETA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14725/2025 · 2025-10-14

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42144] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15734/2025 Abhimanyu Singh Bhati S/o Vallab Singh Bhati, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village-Sherpur, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary. 2. District Collector, Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. 3. The Tehsildar, Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. 4. UIT, Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Laxmi Narayan Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 15/10/2025 1. Heard. 2. Issue notice to the respondents. 3. Mr. V.D. Gathala, learned AGC puts in appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. His name be shown in the cause list as counsel for the respondents. 4. Service is treated as complete. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply copy of petition to learned counsel for the respondents. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner raised the construction upon his residential property for self accommodation and storing farming machines vide permission [2025:RJ-JP:42144] (2 of 2) [CW-15734/2025] order dated 22.01.2021 (Annexure-2), which was issued by the respondent No. 3- Tehsildar, Sawai Madhopur and thereby, the petitioner was granted permission to raise the construction on 1/50th part of the Khatedari land. The petitioner thus, constructed a house and PG house, which was permitted under the aforesaid order. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that as the respondent No.3 has issued a notice dated 01.09.2025 for demolition of the construction raised by the petitioner, therefore, the effect and operation of the impugned notice dated 01.09.2025 be stayed. 7. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks time to file reply. 8. List the matter after four weeks, as prayed. 9. In the meanwhile, the respondents shall not demolish the construction raised by the petitioner as per the permission granted vide Annexure-2 dated 22.01.2021. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /23