DEVANG CHOUDHARY S/O SHRI ARJUN LAL CHOUDHARY v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/1029/2025 · 2025-03-24
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3671 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3671 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:13117] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1029/2025
1. Devang Choudhary S/o Shri Arjun Lal Choudhary, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Rampura Dhani, District Jaipur-303704.
2. Ayush Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Rambabu Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Gadh, Post Tunga, District Jaipur-303302.
3. Yash Kumawat S/o Shri Rajesh Kumawat, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Dholi Mandi, Post Chomu, District Jaipur-
303702.
4. Raj Sharma S/o Shri Gopal Lal Sharma, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Gadh, Post Tunga, District Jaipur- 303302
5. Gautum Pareek S/o Shri Kamal Kishore Pareek, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Chhota Bajar, Malwo Ki Gali, Sambhar, District Jaipur-303604.
6. Kishan Bunkar S/o Shri Babulal Bunkar, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of B-38, Krishna Vihar, Bhankrota, District Jaipur-302026. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Urban Development And Housing Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj).
2. Commissioner, Nagar Nigam Greater, Jaipur (Raj).
3. Dy. Commissioner, Malviya Nagar Zone, Nagar Nigam Greater, Jaipur (Raj).
4. Sb 2 Library, Through Its Owner, Manav Ashram Colony, Vasundara Colony, Gopalpura Mod, Jaipur (Raj)-302018. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order
[2025:RJ-JP:13117] (2 of 2) [CW-1029/2025] 24/03/2025 No one has put in appearance on behalf of petitioners. On the previous occasion on 23.01.2025, no one even in second round was put in appearance and today also, no one has put in appearance on behalf of petitioners to pursue the writ petition. Petitioners claimed for issuing direction to provide study material, seized by the respondents on 31.07.2024. It appears that grievance of petitioners has been resolved, however the writ petition is dismissed in default and for non- prosecution.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/24