[2025:RJ-JP:48678] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13273/2025 1. Saddik S/o Atar Khan @ Sirdi, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Parehi, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Dilshad @ Jilshad @ Jilla S/o Atar Khan @ Sirdi, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Parehi, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Applicants Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP For Complainant : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 01/12/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 0159/2025 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 281, 125, 352, 333, 103(1), 115(2), 189(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that the applicants are sole bread earners of their families, aged 25 years and 29 years respectively. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the applicants. It is also submitted that the applicants have been in custody since [2025:RJ-JP:48678] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13273/2025] 23.05.2025. Learned counsel further submits that cross FIRs have been registered in the instant matter, and no specific allegation has been attributed to the present applicants in the FIR. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the instant bail application and submitted that lathi/saria/iron rods have been recovered from the applicants. It is further submitted that a pregnant woman was brutally murdered in the instant case and that the FSL report is still awaited. It is also submitted that the said incident occurred merely on account of rash driving and a large number of persons have gathered at the place of occurrence, which was the residence of the deceased. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the fact that the recovery of the iron rods have been made from the applicant; that a pregnant woman was brutally murdered in the instant matter and looking to the overall acts and circumstances and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicants. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed, at this stage. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/77