SHREEKRISHNA LAXMAN HIPPARKAR AND ANR v. YADAV MADHUKAR RANGRAO AND ORS
CP/40/2016 · 2025-10-07
Sharmila U Deshmukh, Shri M S Karnik
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36704 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36704 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
11-Cp-40-2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 40 OF 2016 Shreekrishna Laxman Hipparkar & Anr. … Petitioners Versus Yadav Madhukar Rangrao & Ors. … Respondents —————— Mr. Q.H. Kudle i/b. Mr. Shikur Gafur Kudle for the Petitioners. Mr. Siddheshwar B. Kalel, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. ——————
Coram : M. S. Karnik & Sharmila U. Deshmukh, JJ. Date : 7th October 2025.
P. C. :
1.
Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that he is unable to seek instructions from the Petitioners.
2. Learned A.G.P. submits that the order has been duly complied with and that may be the reason the Petitioners are not in touch with the
learned counsel for the Petitioners.
3. We do not see any reason to proceed further with the Contempt Petition. In view of the stand of the learned A.G.P., the Contempt Petition is disposed of. [ Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik, J. ] osk 1 of
1 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2025.10.07 18:17:40 +0530