Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 367 (PNJ)

SEEMA v. JYOTI PARSHAD ALIAS JATIN

TA/1461/2025 · 2026-02-11

Archana Puri

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 TA-1461-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.206 TA-1461-2025 Date of Decision: 11.02.2026 SEEMA ....Applicant Versus JYOTI PARSHAD @ JATIN .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI . Present:- Mr. Vansh Malhotra, Advocate for the applicant. None for the respondent. ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) As observed in the previous order, despite service, respondent had not made appearance. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent. As such, the respondent is hereby proceeded against ex parte. Counsel for the applicant heard. The applicant-wife has filed the present application for seeking transfer of the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. DMC/633/2025, titled ‘Jyoti Parshad @ Jatin Vs. Seema’, filed by the respondent-husband, pending in the Family Court, Hisar and she seeks transfer of the same to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Kaithal. It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 26.10.2015 and one girl PREETI 2026.02.23 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 TA-1461-2025 child born from the said wedlock, who is about 9 years old, is in the care and custody of the applicant and is studying in school at Kaithal. The applicant is doing her job as consultant at KIA, for a sum of Rs.10,000/-, in Kaithal. The applicant has filed one petition under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., which is pending in the Courts at Kaithal and respondent is pursuing the same. The distance between the two places is stated to be 130 kilometres. In view of the aforesaid submissions, more particularly, considering the fact of growing daughter, to be in the care and custody of the applicant and the distance between the two places, as well as one litigation already pending at Kaithal, which is pursued by the respondent and above it, the respondent not having come forward to resist the transfer application, the same is allowed and the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. DMC/633/2025, titled ‘Jyoti Parshad @ Jatin Vs. Seema’, filed by the respondent-husband, stands transferred from the Family Court, Hisar, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Kaithal. The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Family Court, Hisar, to the District and Sessions Judge, Kaithal. Learned District and Sessions Judge, Kaithal, shall assign the said petition to the Family Court, Kaithal. Even, the parties are directed to appear before the Family Court, Kaithal, within a period of one month from today onwards. (ARCHANA PURI) 11.02.2026 JUDGE Preeti S. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes PREETI 2026.02.23 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3 TA-1461-2025 Whether reportable : Yes/No PREETI 2026.02.23 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document