APHC010601952013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 15852/2013 Between: 1. PERSONAL OFFR, M/S SUJALA PIPES PVT LTD., KURNOOL DIST, REP. BY ITS PERSONAL OFFICER, M.N.SUBBARAYUDU, C-1, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. JT DIRECTOR EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORP HYD 2, REGIONAL OFFICE , EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, 5-9-23, ADARSH NAGAR, HYDERABAD. 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, 5-923, ADARSH NAGAR, HYDERABAD. 3. RECOVERY OFFICER, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, 5-923, ADARSH NAGAR, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the order of the 1st respondent No:52-00- 007937-000-0205 dated 21.02.2013 is illegal, arbritary and violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India and contrary to the Employees state Insurance Act 1948 and rules made there under and set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 19193 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the 1st respondent No:52-00- 007937-000-0205 dated 21.02.2013 pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAREDDY ROSI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P RAJASEKHAR 2. B G RAVINDER REDDY The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 25.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 27.06.2025 IKN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 15852 of 2013 Date: 27.06.2025 IKN