Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36694 (RAJ)

VIJENDRA SINGH SON OF SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD v. ONKARMAL SON OF SHRI GANESHRAM

CW/16632/2025 · 2025-11-10

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44941] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16632/2025 Vijendra Singh son of Shri Jagdish Prasad, aged about 48 Years, Resident of Dhani Hemawali, Gram Panchayat Godawas, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Onkarmal son of Shri Ganeshram, 2. Sheopal son of Shri Ganeshram, Residents of Dhani Rajuwali (Raj Nagar), Tehsil Neemkathana, District S ikar (Raj.) 3. Bhagwan Singh son of Shri Ram Singh, Resident of Jasota, District Dausa - at present resident of Village Bhagot, Panchayat Bhagega, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar (Raj.) 4. Ram Singh son of Shri Ganesh Ram, Resident of Dhani Rajiwali (Raj Nagar), Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar (Raj.) 5. Harchand son of Shri Rudaram, Resident of Dhani Hemawali, Tan Godawas, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar (Raj.) 6. Mangal Chand son of Shri Boojanram Jat, Resident of Keerpura, Tan Napawali, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Gupta For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 10/11/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the order dated 19.08.2025 passed by the Civil Judge, Neemkathana, District Sikar, whereby the application of the plaintiffs was allowed and the documents filed by the petitioner were held to be inadmissible in evidence for want of registration and insufficiently stamped. [2025:RJ-JP:44941] (2 of 2) [CW-16632/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay deficient stamp duty and thus seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition at this stage, with liberty to move an appropriate application for payment of the requisite stamp duty etc. 3. Permission sought for is granted. 4. In view of the above, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. 5. In case the petitioner filed an appropriate application for payment of necessary/ deficient stamp duty etc., the same will be considered in accordance with the law without being influenced by this order. 6. Any other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /13