Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36694 (JHR)

SMRUTI RANJAN BISWAL ALIAS SMRITY RANJAN BISWAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./3443/2025 · 2025-12-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:35828 ) 1 Cr. M.P. No.3443 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.3443 of 2025 ------ 1. Smruti Ranjan Biswal @ Smrity Ranjan Biswal, aged about 56 years, S/o Dr. Trilokya Bhushan Biswal, 2. Sweta Biswal wife of Smriti Ranjan Biswal, aged about 54 years, both are R/o Village-Plot No.1266/10, Sector-01, CDA, P.O. + P.S.-CDA Phase 02, District-Cuttack, Orissa. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Madhav Prasad, Advocate : Mr. Manoj Kr. Choubey, Advocate : Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl.P.P. ------ P R E S E N T HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY By the Court:- Heard the parties. 2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 with the twin prayers to quash the orders dated 19.11.2018 and 15.05.2019 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.136 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. Case No.2160 of 2017 whereby and where the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur has issued proclamation under Section 82 & 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the petitioners respectively. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not press the prayer to quash the order dated 15.05.2019 ( 2025:JHHC:35828 ) 2 Cr. M.P. No.3443 of 2025 as no property of the petitioners has been attached as yet, in execution of the warrant of attachment of the property of the petitioner issued by the court concerned and confines his prayer only to quash the order dated 19.11.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.136 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. Case No.2160 of 2017. 4. Accordingly, the prayer to quash the order dated 15.05.2019 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.136 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. Case No.2160 of 2017 is rejected as not pressed. 5. So far as the order dated 19.11.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.136 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. Case No.2160 of 2017 is concerned, the learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the same is not sustainable in law having been passed without following the settled principle of law by not recording the satisfaction that the petitioners are absconding or concealing themselves to evade their arrest which is a sine qua non for issuing proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C., that too without fixing any time and place for appearance of the petitioners, who are the accused persons of the said case. Hence, it is submitted that the order dated 19.11.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.136 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. Case No.2160 of 2017, be allowed. ( 2025:JHHC:35828 ) 3 Cr. M.P. No.3443 of 2025 6. Learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for quashing the order dated 19.11.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.136 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. Case No.2160 of 2017 whereby and where under the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur has issued proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. and submits that the very fact that the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur has issued the proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. itself shows that there were materials available in the record for the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur to be satisfied that there is justification for issuance of such proclamation. Hence, it is submitted that this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, being without any merit, be dismissed. 7. Having heard the rival submissions made at the Bar and after carefully going through the materials available in the record, it is pertinent to mention here that by now it is a settled principle of law that the court which issues the proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. must record its satisfaction that the accused in respect of whom the proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. is made, is absconding or concealing themselves to evade their arrest and in case the court decides to issue proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. it must mention the time and place for appearance of the petitioners in the order itself by which the proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. is issued. As already indicated above since the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur has ( 2025:JHHC:35828 ) 4 Cr. M.P. No.3443 of 2025 neither recorded its satisfaction that the petitioners are absconding or concealing themselves to evade their arrest nor fixed any time or place for appearance of the petitioners, this Court has no hesitation in holding that the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur has committed illegality by issuing the said proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. without complying with the mandatory requirements of law. Hence, the same is not sustainable in law and the continuation of the same will amount to abuse of process of law and this is a fit case where the order dated 19.11.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.136 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. Case No.2160 of 2017, be quashed and set aside qua the petitioners only. 8. Accordingly, the order dated 19.11.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.136 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. Case No.2160 of 2017, is quashed and set aside qua the petitioners only. 9. The learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur or its successor Court may pass a fresh order in accordance with law. 10. In the result, this Cr.M.P. stands allowed. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Dated the 01st of December, 2025 AFR/ Abhiraj Uploaded on 15/12/2025