IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 223 TIKAK RAJ STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : None for the petitioner. Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab MANISHA BATRA There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the fact that the matter has been passed over twice hearing, none has appeared on his behalf. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petition any more. Hence, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution. 13.05.2025 Jyoti-IV IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: Versus STATE OF PUNJAB HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA None for the petitioner. Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the fact that the matter has been passed over twice none has appeared on his behalf. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petition any more. Hence, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.17619 of 2024 Date of decision: 13.05.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondent MANISHA BATRA There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the fact that the matter has been passed over twice. Even on the last date of It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petition any more. Hence, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the . Even on the last date of It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present Jyoti 2025.05.13 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document