Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36690 (PAT)

Chhednai Praween @ Sajda @ Chhedni @ Sajada v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./26203/2025 · 2025-05-06

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26203 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2025 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== 1. Chhednai Praween @ Sajda @ Chhedni @ Sajada W/o- Ehsan Village- Tapra W.NO-11, Ps- Bhargama Dist- Araria 2. Sanisha Khatoon W/o- Saheed Village- Tapra W.NO-11, Ps- Bhargama Dist- Araria 3. Janisha Khatoon W/o- Gulzar Village- Tapra W.NO-11, Ps- Bhargama Dist- Araria 4. Ehsan S/o- Nasir Village- Hingwa Ps- Bhargama Dist- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 06-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 85, 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 3. As per F.I.R., informant was married with co- accused Alisher 6 years ago and after the marriage, all the accused persons including petitioners committed torture and harassment to informant for dowry and finally, ousted her from her matrimonial house. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26203 of 2025(2) dt.06-05-2025 2/2 4. Petitioner nos. 1 to 3 are married sister-in-law (uun) and petitioner no. 4 is brother-in-law (uunksbZ) of the informant. Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the informant. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the family affairs of informant and her husband. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners. 6. However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Araria in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 42 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T