Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36689 (PNJ)

RAJPAL SINGH v. JITENDER KUMAR AND ANOTHER

COCP/1609/2024 · 2025-07-09

Harkesh Manuja

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1609-2024 (O&M) Decided on:-09.07.2025 Raj Pal Singh ....Petitioner.. vs. Mr.Jitender Kumar and another ....Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate and Mr. Vicky Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** HARKESH MANUJA J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that apparently a sum of Rs.9,31,104/- has been paid to the petitioner against regularization of his services w.e.f. 30.08.1991 and its counting towards qualifying services for the purpose of pension. 2. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition, as such, the same is disposed of. Rule stands discharged. 2.1 However, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the present contempt petition, in case, any claim still survive. 3. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 09.07.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/ No SONIKA 2025.07.10 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document