Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3667 (KER)

KHADIMUL ISLAM SANGHAM PUTHEN JUMA-MASJID COMMITTEE v. MUHAMMED RAFI

CRP(WAKF)/498/2018 · 2025-03-26

Amit Rawal, K V Jayakumar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. V. JAYAKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CRP(WAKF) NO. 498 OF 2018 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.12.2017 IN W.O.S. NO.28 OF 2014 OF WAKF TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM REVISION PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: KHADIMUL ISLAM SANGHAM PUTHEN JUMA-MASJID COMMITTEE PALAKKAZHI, KARKIDAMKUNU P.O, PLAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESENT SECRETARY, MOHAMMED, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O KUNHAYAMUM,KALPPARA HOUSE, KARKKIDAMKUNNU P.O, PALAKKAZHI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ SRI.K.P.MAJEED RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS: 1 MUHAMMED RAFI, PALAKKAZHI AMSOM, KARKIDAMKUNNU DESOM, ALANALLUR P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678601. 2 THEVARKALATHIL MUJEEB, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O T.K.ASSAINAR, PALAKKAZHI AMSOM, KARKIDAMKUNNU DESOM, ALANALLUR P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678601. 3 KUMBALAKKUZHIYAN FAZALUDHEEN, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O K.K.KAKKUTTY MUHAMMEDUPPA PALAKKAZHI DESOM, , KARKIDAMKUNNU AMSOM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678605. 4 KUMBALAKKUZGHIYAN LATHEEF, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O LATE AYAMU, PALAKKAZHI DESOM, KARKIDAMKUNNU AMSOM, CRP(WAKF) NO. 498 OF 2018 -2- 2025:KER:29808 PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678605. 5 THEVARKALATHIL NOUSHAD, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O T.K.ABDUL AZEEZ PALAKKAZHI AMSOM, KARKIDAMKUNNU DESOM, ALANALLUR P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678605. 6 THE KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE WAKF BOARD OFFICE, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682017 BY ADV. : SRI JAMSHEED HAFIZ, SC, WAQF THIS CRP (WAKF ACT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CRP(WAKF) NO. 498 OF 2018 -3- 2025:KER:29808 ORDER AMIT RAWAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that owing to the lapse of time the matter has become infructuous as it was only against the suit for prohibitory injunction which was dismissed and the matter is ordered to be closed. Thus, C.R.P.(Wakf) is closed as infructuous. Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE Sd/- K. V. JAYAKUMAR JUDGE VV