Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36664 (PNJ)

SHARIF v. MUBEEN KHAN ETC.

FAO/1226/2004 · 2025-09-24

Virinder Aggarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (218) FAO-1226-2004 (O&M) Date of Decision:-24.09.2025 SHARIF … Appellant Versus MUBEEN KHAN AND OTHERS ... Respondents -.- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. Shamsher Kaur, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellants today. Same was the situation for quite some time. It seems that appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. 2. In such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellant to revive the same, if have any grievance from this order, within a period of three months from today. 4. As a natural corollary, since the main case stands disposed of, all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, as no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping them pending. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 24.09.2025 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No SAURAV PATHANIA 2025.09.25 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document