Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36660 (ORI)

RASANA KHATUN v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/15018/2025 · 2025-05-27

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.15018 of 2025 Rasana Khatun …. Petitioner Mr. B.K. Behera-1, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.B. Mohanty, AGA COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 27.05.2025 1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- It is therefore most respectfully prayed that, this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to:- A. Admit this writ application. B. As to why the Opp Parties more particularly Opp. Party Nos.3 & 5 shall not be directed to act upon grievances as well as representations filed by the Petitioner along with the parents of the student of the minority school under Annexure-5 series, and, C. And as to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper. And on their failure to show cause or showing in sufficient cause, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to make the said Rule absolute by way of issuing appropriate writ or writs, order or orders in the facts and circumstances of the present case. p. 2 p. 2 And for this act of your Lordships kindness the Petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray. 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting her grievances, Petitioner has made a representation before Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-5 to the Writ Petition and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition with a direction on Opposite Party No.2 to consider and dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-5 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order by giving due opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Vacation Judge sangita