Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3666 (JK)

PAWAN KUMAR v. JAMMU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN JAMMU AND OTHERS.

WP(C)/1809/2020 · 2025-03-19

Vinod Chatterji Koul

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 1809/2020 CM No. 6358/2020 Pawan Kumar …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. VikasMangotra, Advocate Vs Jammu Development Authority and ors .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE ORDER 19.03.2025 Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the relief sought by the petitioner has been granted except execution of lease deed in respect of plot no. 89-P, Sector No. 9, JDA HousingColony, Trikuta Nagar, Jammu, measuring 40’ x 80’ in favour ofthe petitioner, in due discharge of their legal obligation. Learned counsel for the respondents further submits that the aforesaid lease deed would be executed within a period of two weeks positively. His statement is taken on record. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms. (VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE Jammu: 19.03.2025 Suraj 7