PAWAN KUMAR v. JAMMU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN JAMMU AND OTHERS.
WP(C)/1809/2020 · 2025-03-19
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3666 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3666 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 1809/2020 CM No. 6358/2020
Pawan Kumar
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. VikasMangotra, Advocate
Vs
Jammu Development Authority and ors .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER 19.03.2025
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the relief sought by the petitioner has been granted except execution of lease deed in respect of plot no. 89-P, Sector No. 9, JDA HousingColony, Trikuta Nagar, Jammu, measuring 40’ x 80’ in favour ofthe petitioner, in due discharge of their legal obligation.
Learned counsel for the respondents further submits that the aforesaid lease deed would be executed within a period of two weeks positively. His statement is taken on record. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE
Jammu: 19.03.2025 Suraj 7