Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36659 (JHR)

FURKAN @ FURKAN MALIK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./10092/2025 · 2025-11-28

Rajesh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:35589 1 B.A. No. 10092 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10092 of 2025 Furkan @ Furkan Malik, aged about 27 years, S/o Islamuddin, R/o. I.S.M. Chowk, Pundag, P.O. and P.S.- Pundag, District-Ranchi ........Petitioner(s) Vrs. The State of Jharkhand .......... Opposite Party(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P. 03/28.11.2025 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. 2. The applicant who is in custody since 27.07.2025 has renewed the prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No. 217 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 310(2) and 311 of the B.N.S., pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosures have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. 4. Earlier the bail application of this applicant was rejected vide order dated 25.09.2025 passed in B.A. No. 8396 of 2025. This is the second attempt for grant of regular bail. 5. Prayer for bail of the applicant has been renewed stating that the investigation is complete and the case is at the stage of commitment as is apparent from report received from the Trial Court vide letter no. 574 dated 24.11.2025. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated co-accused namely Jitendra Kumar has been granted bail vide order dated 26.09.2025 in B.A. No. 8984 of 2025 and another co-accused namely Deepak Kumar Soni has been granted regular bail vide order dated 26.09.2025 in B.A. No. 8993 of 2025. 6. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant. 7. Considering the period of custody and also the fact that similarly situated co-accused have been granted regular bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on 2025:JHHC:35589 2 B.A. No. 10092 of 2025 furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No. 217 of 2025, subject to condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned trial court which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court and he is directed to report once in a month to the concerned police station. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 28.11.2025 A.Mohanty