1 2025:CGHC:41203 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8413 of 2025 1 - Madan Lal Gavel S/o Late Shri Bhoklu Ram Gavel Aged About 56 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.), Government Middle School, Bakeli Block Kharsia, Kharisia, District- Raigarh, C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan Post Office Mantralaya P.S., Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - The Director Directorate of Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, C.G. 3 - Joint Director School Education Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, C.G. 4 - Collector District Raigarh, C.G. 5 - District Education Officer Raigarh, District Raigarh, C.G. 6 - Block Education Officer Kharsia, District Raigarh, C.G. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Aditya Sharma, Advocate For State-Respondents : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 14-08-2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his transfer order after declaring surplus Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of with liberty to move fresh representation and in turn the District Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07-07-2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07-07-2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07-07- 2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07-07-2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in objective manner. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil