RSA-1922-1999 (O&M) -:1:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (215) RSA-1922-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision:-11.08.2025 SMT.LEELA WATI … Appellant Versus PRITAM DASS ... Respondent -.- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- None for the appellant. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. No one is appearing on behalf of the appellant since long. As per report of Registry, notice issued to the appellant has been received back unserved with the report that she is residing at Delhi but address of Delhi is not available with the Court. In such circumstances no effort can be made to secure presence of the appellant. There is no other option before this Court except to dismiss for want of prosecution. 2. In view of the above and given the prevailing circumstances, there seems to be no justification to keep the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellants to revive the same, if have any grievance from this order, within a period of three months from today. 3. Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands also disposed of. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 11.08.2025 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2025.08.13 14:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document