IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40595 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2025 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Saharsa ====================================================== 1. Sangeeta Kumari @ Sangeeta Devi wife of Wakil Kumar R/o Khajuri Ward No. 19, P.S. -Baijnathpur District -Saharsa 2. wakil Kumar son of Ghuran Yadav @ Ghoran Yadav R/o Khajuri Ward No. 19, P.S. -Baijnathpur District -Saharsa 3. Harsh Kumar @ Utpal Anand son of Wakil Kumar R/o Khajuri Ward No. 19, P.S. -Baijnathpur District -Saharsa 4. Satyajeet Anand @ Honey son of of Wakil Kumar R/o Khajuri Ward No. 19, P.S. -Baijnathpur District -Saharsa 5. Rampukar Yadav @ Rajeev Ranjan son of Ghuran Yadav @ Ghoran Yadav R/o Khajuri Ward No. 19, P.S. -Baijnathpur District -Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Dept.of Home, govt. of Bihar, Main Secretariat Patna, Bihar 2. The Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar Main Secretariat, Patna bihar 3. The Superintendent of Police, Saharsa, Dist- Saharsa bihar 4. The Station House Officer, Mahila Ps, Saharsa, Dist- Saharsa bihar 5. The Investigating Officer of the Mahila Ps Case no. 6 of 2025 dated 21.02.2025 dist- Saharsa bihar 6. Sakshi Yaduvanshi @ Sakshi Kumari Daughter of Ratnesh Yadav village- Ghoghanpatti, Ward no. 4, Ps- Patarghat, Dist- Saharsa ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Mandal, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 03-04-2026 At the very outset learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that by passage of time the investigation has been concluded followed by order taking cognizance and hence he intends to challenge the order taking cognizance. 2. Prayer is allowed. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40595 of 2025(2) dt.03-04-2026 2/2 3. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed my opinion on the merits of this case. niku/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T