Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36635 (HP)

BULLU RAM v. PRABH DYAL

RSA/526/2010 · 2025-11-28

Romesh Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Bullu Ram and others vs. Prabh Dyal RSA No. 526 of 2010 28.11.2025 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants, except appellant No.1, who is stated to have expired. Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for the respondent. On 28.03.2025, learned counsel for the respondent, made a statement that appellant No.1 has expired. Learned counsel for the appellant had sought time to have instructions in that regard and four weeks’ time was granted to take appropriate steps. Thereafter, the matter was fixed on 03.06.2025, 16.07.2025 and 21.08.2025 but till date no consequential steps have been taken on account of death of appellant No.1. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that registered letter was sent to appellant No.2 Prem Singh but none has turned up to take appropriate steps. Since the consequnetial steps have not been taken, therefore, the present appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. (Romesh Verma) November 28, 2025 (Nisha) Judge