Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36633 (AP)

Special Deputy Collector v. S. Nadipi Kotaiah

LAAS/38/2016 · 2025-07-30

Ninala Jayasurya, Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ’ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NOS: 38. 40. 43. 49. 51. 59 AND 69 OF 2016 LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 38 OF 2016 APHC010598782016 Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree dt.30/10/2015 passed in O.P.No. 142 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyai ...Appellant/Petitioner AND S Nadipi Kotaiah S/o. Pullaiah, aged about 45 years Maseedupuram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. R/o. ...Respondent/Claimant =2-— r lA NO: 1 OF 2016 fLAASMP 394 OF 2016^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the decree and order passed in O.P. No.142/2012 dated 30.10.2015 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Counsel for the Petitioner: GP for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savithri Devi LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 40 OF 2016 APHC010821952016 Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree dt. 30/10/2015 passed in O.P.No. 141 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal ...Appellant/Petitioner/Respondent AND B Dasthagiri Son of Dasthagiri, aged about 40 years Maseedupuram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. R/o. ...Respondent/Claimant/Petitioner 3 lA NO: 1 OF 2016 (LAASMP 379 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the decree and order passed in O.P No.141/2012 dt.30.10.2015 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Counsel for the Petitioner: GP for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savithri Devi LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 43 OF 2016 APHC010348012016 Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree dt. 30/10/2015 passed in O.P.No. 153 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal ...Appellant/Petitioner/Respondent AND Chinna Chennaiah, son of Mugenna aged about 45 years, r/o. Deebagunta village, Gospadu Mandal, Kurnool District ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 1 OF 2016 (LAASMP 378 OF 20161 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to c grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the decree and order in O.P. No.153/2012 dated 30.10.2015 Allagadda, Kurnool District passed on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Counsel for the Petitioner: GP for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savithri Devi LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 49 OF 2016 APHC010682012016 Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree dt. 30/10/2015 passed in O.P.No.143 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal ...Appellant/Petitioner/Respondent AND S Chinnanna, Son of Moogenna, aged about 45 years, R/o. Deebagunta Village, Gospadu Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 1 OF 2016 ILAASMP 392 OF 20161 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the decree and order passed in O.P. No.143/2012 dated 30.10.2015 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District 5" ( Counsel for the Petitioner: GP for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savlthrl Devi LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 51 OF 2016 APHC010795172016 Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree dt. 30/10/2015 passed in O.P.No.100 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal ...Appellant/Petitioner AND V Mallikarjuna Reddy, Son of Siva Reddy, Aged 42 years, R/o. Deebagunta Village, Gospadu Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Clalmant lA NO: 1 OF 2016 (LAASMP 376 OF 20161 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the decree and order passed in O.P. No. 100/2012 dated 30.10.2015 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool. Counsel for the Petitioner: GP for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savlthrl Devi 6 —' c LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 59 OF 2016 APHC010822152016 Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree dt. 30/10/2015 passed in O.P.No.140 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal ...Appellant/Petitioner AND Mangali Venkata Swamy, Son of Pullanna, Aged about 55 years, R/o. Deebagunta Village, Gospadu Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 1 OF 2016 fLAASMP 397 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the decree and order passed in O.P. No.140/2012 dated 30.10.2015 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District Counsel for the Petitioner: GP for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savithrl Devi ( LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 69 OF 2016 APHC010386762016 wm Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree dt. 30/10/2015 passed in O.P.No.96 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal ...Appellant/Petitioner AND N H P Shankar Reddy, S/o. Hanumanthu Reddy, Aged about 54 years R/o. Deebaguntia Village, Gospadu Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 1 OF 2016(LAASMP 380 OF 2016^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the decree and order passed in O.P No.96/12 dt.30.10.2015 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Counsel for the Petitioner: GP for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savithri Devi The Court made the following: r APHC010598782016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL Nos. 38. 40. 43. 49. 51. 59 AND 69 of 2016 BETWEEN: 1. Special Deputy Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal ...Appellant AND 1.S Nadipi Kotaiah, S/o. Pullaiah R/o. Maseedupuram Village Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent The appeal is filed against the Order and Decree passed in O.P.No. 142 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Counsel for the Appellant: 1.GP FOR APPEALS (AP) Counsel for the Respondent: 2 COMMON JUDGMENT: {Per Hon’ble $ri Justice Ninala Jayasurya) The present batch of appeals have been filed against the common order dated 30.10.2014 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, in L.A.O.P. Nos.142, 141, 153, 143, 100, 140 and 96 of 2012. At the time of considering the appeals, learned Government Pleader for Appeals fairly stated that the matters are covered by the decision of this Court in L.A.A.S. No.279 of 2015 and batch dated 13.02.2025. Considering the said submission and for the reasons alike, these appeals are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in these cases, shall stand closed. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allagadda, Kurnool District (with records). ^One CC to Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savithri Devi Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Appeals, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. 5. Two CD Copies f' f SAM vna * Along with Photocopy of the certified copy of Common Judgment dated 13.02.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in LAAS No.279 of 2015 & Batch. / HIGH COURT DATED:31/07/2025 COMMON JUDGMENT + DECREE LAAS Nos. 38, 40, 43, 49, 51, 59 and 69 of 2016 V I 15 SEP 2925 I Current Seciion DISMISSING THESE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUITS 7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV. yM Ayo THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUAFj[Y.|;|r^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NOS: 279. 209, 210, 218 AND 308 OF 2015 LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 279 OF 2015 AjDpeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree passed in O.P No.32/2012 dt 30-08-2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Altagadda, Kurnool District. Between: The Special Deputy Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...APPELLANT/REFERRING OFFICER AND K.Prasad, S/o Moulali, Aged, 37, years, R/o Chennur Village Sirivella IVtandal, Kurnool District ...RESPONDENT/CLAIMANT Counsel for the Appellant : MR T S RAYULU GP FOR APPEALS (AP) Counsel for the Respondent: SRI BALLA RAVINDRANATH & SAVITHRI DEVI LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 209 OF 2015 Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against tfie Order and Decree passed in OP No. 160/2012 dt 30-08-2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: The Special Deputy Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...APPELLANT/REFERRING OFFICER AND Dasari Ramudu, S/o.Ch,Thirupaiaiah, Aged, 36, years, R/o.Chennur Village, Sirivella Mandal, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENT/CLAIMANT Counsel for the Appellant : MR T S RAYULU GP FOR APPEALS (AP) Counsel for the Respondent : SRI BALLA RAVINDRANATH & SAVITHRI DEVI LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 210 OF 2015 Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree passed in O.P No.163/2012 dt 30-08-2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: The Special Deputy Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...APPELLANT/REFERRING OFFICER AND Y.Ratna Babu, S/o.Ranganna, Aged, 46, years, R/o.Chennur Vitlage Sirivella Mandai, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENT/CLAIMANT Counsel for the Appellant : MR T S RAYULU GP FOR APPEALS (AP) Counsel for the Respondent: SRI BALLA RAVINDRANATH & SAVITHRI ^ DEVI LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 218 OF 2015 Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree passed in O.P No.83/2012 dt 30-08-2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda. Kurnool District. Between: The Special Deputy Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. APPELLANT/REFERRING OFFICER AND P.Chandra Sekhar, S/o Pamuleti, Aged, 34, years, R/o Beeravolu Village, Rudravaram Mandai, Kurnool District. .RESPONDENT/CLAIMANT Counsel for the Appellant : MR T S RAYULU GP FOR APPEALS (AP) , Counsel for the Respondent: SRI BALLA RAVINDRANATH & SAVITHRI DEVI . LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 308 OF 2015 Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 18^4, against i' the Order and Decree passed in OP No, 164/2012 dt 30-08-2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: The Special Deputy Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...APPELLANT/REFERRING OFFICER AND K.Ch.Mallesudu, S/o.Pedda Basetty, Aged, 51, years, R/o.Chennur Village, Sirivella Mandal, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENT/CLAIMANT : MR T S RAYULU GP FOR APPEALS (AP) Counsel for the Appellant Counsel for the Respondent: SRI BALLA RAVINDRANATH & SAVITHRI DEVI The Court made the following JUDGMENT : ■ r APHC010293862015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) EISB [3495] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT Nos:279. 209. 210. 218 and 308 of 2015 L.A.A.S No.279 of 2015 Between: The Special Deputy Collector Cum Land Acquisition Officer AND ...APPELLANT K Prasad Kurnool District ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1.GP FOR APPEALS (AP) Counsel for the Respondent: 1.BALLA RAVINDRANATH & SAVITHRI DEVI The Court made the following Common Judgment: (per NJS,J) The present batch of appeals arise out of a common order dated 30.08.2bl4 in LA.O.P Nos.32, 83, 160, 163 and 164 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda. 2. Heard Mr. T S Rayulu, learned Government Pleader for the appellant. Also heard Smt. B Savithri Devi, learned counsel for the respondents, who appeared through online. Contd... , « . ^ A/JS, J & TMR,J m L. A. A. S-Nos. 279 of 2015 and batch- ^ 2 3. For the purpose of excavation of 9R Sub-minor Distributary in Block No. 14 of Telugu Ganga Project, different extents of lands of the respondents in various survey numbers of Chennur Village Notification dated 12.05.2005 i were acquired, pursuant to a issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act. 1894 (herein after referred to as the ‘Act’). The Land Acquisition Officer, after conducting enquiry, passed Award No.72 of 2005-06 granting compensation of Rs.35,000/- per acre. Aggrieved by the same, the claimants sought reference under Section 18 of the Act claiming compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- answered the reference by fixing compensation at Rs. 1,00,000/- apart from awarding statutory benefits. per acre. The learned Reference Court per acre 4. The learned Government Pleader inter alia Acquisition Officer had considered all the relevant factors Award proceedings and fixed the market value Rs.35 000/ contends that the Land during the course of - per acre, which is Just and reasonable. He submits that the fixation of market value by the Reference Court is without any valid basis excessive and not sustainable. He submits that the learned Reference Court went wrong in fixing the compensation on the basis of Ex.A1, Sale Deed dated 09.02.2004 i of lands situate in another village and far away from the lands under the present acquisition and potentiality of the in respect same is not similar. He also contends that the nature of the lands in the same village varies from one place to the other. Making the said submissions, the learned emphatically submits that the fixation of compensation by the Reference Court is on higher side, amounts to enhancement interference by this Court. Government Pleader on enhancement and warrants 5. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing ‘ for the respondents/claimants sought to sustain the orders of the Reference Court by consideration all compensation in respect of the contending that the learned Reference Court had taken into the relevant factors and rightly fixed the Contd... NJS,J & TMR,J L.A.A.S Nos.279 of 2015 and batch 3 subject matter lands. She submits that the evidence on record would establish that the subject matter lands are nearer to the land situate in the neighbouring village which was sold vide Ex.A1 dated 09.02.2004. She also submits that the learned Reference Court had rightly relied on the decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and it is settled law that while fixing the market value, when there are no sales in the concerned Village where the lands are situated, the market value of the lands in the adjoining villages or the Award in respect of the same can be taken into consideration for fixing the market value. Making the said submissions, the learned counsel contends that there are no merits, much less, valid grounds in the present appeals and seeks dismissal of the same. 6. This Court has considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides and the perused the material available on record. On an appreciation of the rival contentions, the point that arises for consideration in this batch of appeals is as to whether the order of the Reference Court warrants interference, in the facts and circumstances of the case? 7. Before answering the point, it is to be noted that before the Reference Court, PWs.1 and 2 were examined on behalf of the respondents/claimants and Ex.A1, Certified copy of the Registered Sale Deed dated 09.02.2004 was marked, wherein an extent of 0.68 cents was sold for Rs.68,000/- which works 1 , to Rs. 1,00,000/- per acre. No oral or documentary evidence was adduced on behalf of the Referring Officer. Ex.B1, Copy of Award No.72/2005-06 dated 20.03.2006 was marked with consent. 8. PW1 in his evidence categorically stated that the acquired land is black cotton soil, he used to raise paddy, turmeric, sugar cane in his bore irrigated dry land and was getting Rs.30,000/- per acre, per year. He further testified that Telugu Ganga main canal flows via Velugodu, Boyarevula, 9. Contd... I NJS.J & TMR.J L.AA.S Nqs.279 of 2015 and batch 4 Narayanapuram, Thimmapuram, Gajulapalli etc., that LAO has acquired land in Mahadevapuram, Chennur, etc., for excavation of major canal, thus all the said villages are connected with Telugu Ganga fertility, cropping pattern and market value. In the deposed that the distance between his village and the neighbouring villages is about one kilometer and that though Ex.A1 belongs to Gajulapalli village, it is pertaining to their adjoining lands. He also denied the was created for the purpose of the canal and are similar in cross examination, he suggestion that Ex.A1 case. PW2, attestor of Ex.A1 dated 09.02.2004 supported the case of PW1 with regard to the nature potentiality of the acquired lands and Ex.A1 transaction land similar. He deposed that the distance between this lands and and that they are under acquisition and Ex.A1 land is 2 Km to 3 Km. Nothing contra could be elicited in the cross examination of PW1 and PW2 that Ex.A1 dated 09.02.2004 is not genuine. brought into existence for the purpose of boosting the claim the same can be safely relied for the purpose of fixing the market value Further, the documentary evidence was adduced by the Referring Officer and the sale statistics/transactions unless exhibited before the Reference cannot be appreciated. artificially. Hence, Court, 10. The learned Reference Court by taking into consideration the evidence as the lands In are situate in the adjoining Villages. In GM, O.N.G.C. Ltd., v. Sendhabhai Vastram Patel’, the Hon'ble Supreme Court inter alia held that instances of sale of similar lands the same village or neighbouring villages can be taken for determination of the market value. Therefore, the contention advanced by the learned Government Pleader is rejected. on record more particularly Ex.A1, fixed the market value question and the lands under Ex.A1 transaction situated in 11. In the present case, the lands are acquired for Telugu Ganga Project and it is not in dispute that they are fertile black cotton soil lands. Though * (200S) 6 see 454 Contd... NJS,J & TMR,J L.A.A.S Nos.279 of 2015 and batch 5 there is a time gap of more than one year between the Ex.A1 sale deed dated 09.02.2004 and the Section 4(1) Notification dated 12.05.2005, the Reference Court has not taken into consideration the value appreciation in terms of Om Prakash vs. Union of India^. However, the claimants have not filed appeals. Be that as it may. Considering the matter in its entirety, this Court is of the view that the enhancement of compensation by the Reference Court was based on the materiai on record, supported by cogent reasons, not on higher side and warrants no interference of this Court. 12. 13. Point for consideration is therefore, answered against the appellants. 14. Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, these appeals are dismissed. No order as to costs. All pending miscellaheous petitions shall stand closed. ^(2004) 10 see 627 SD/- E.KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division): Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2. One CC to GP for Appeals (AP) Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Balia Ravindranath & Savithri Devi Advocate [OPUC] The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 4. 5. THREE CD COPIES SAM TAG I t‘ i HIGH COURT DATED:13/02/2025 ; JUDGMENT + DECREE LAAS.Nos. 279, 209, 210, 218 and 308 of 2015 DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUITS I IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 40 OF 2016 APHC010821952016 ■I Between: Special Deputy Collector-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal ...Appellant/Petitioner/Respondent AND B Dasthagiri, Son of Dasthagiri, aged about 40 Maseedupuram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. years, R/o. ...Respondent/Claimant/Petitioner Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree dt. 30/10/2015 passed in O.P.No. 141 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the appeal and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant, and Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savithri Devi ■Respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the appeal be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. for the Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SAM vna ‘ \ ■ HIGH COURT DATED:31/07/2025 DECREE 5 15 SEP 2825 & ^ Cuirent S««on C9 LAAS No. 40 of 2016 DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 51 OF 2016 APHC010795172016 Bjtils] Between: Special Deputy Collector-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal ...Appellant/Petitioner AND V Mallikarjuna Reddy, Son of Siva Reddy, Aged 42 years, R/o. Deebagunta Village, Gospadu Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree dt. 30/10/2015 passed in O.P.No.100 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material the appeal and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the papers in s ■ Appellant, and Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savithri Devi Respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE AS FOLLOWS: * * ; ^ 1 the appeal be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. for the Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SAM vna A HIGH COURT DATED:31/07/2025 DECREE LAAS No. 51 of 2016 i 5 SEP 2025 ^' Current SecHon DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT ■ ■ '■ -'kk IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 49 OF 2016 APHCM 0682012016 Between: Special Deputy Collector-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal ...Appellant/Petitioner/Respondent AND S Chinnanna, Son of Moogenna, aged about 45 years, R/o. Deebagunta Village, Gospadu Mandal, Kurnod District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree dt. 30/10/2015 passed in O.P.No.143 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material the appeal and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the papers in r Appellant, and Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savithri Respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the appeal be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. Devi for the Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SAM vna HIGH COURT DATED:31/07/2025 DECREE LAAS No. 49 of 2016 % 5 l5SEr2fl25 „ ^ Currani S*cuon DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 43 OF 2016 APHC010348012016 Between: Special Deputy Collector-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal ...Appellant/Petitioner/Respondent AND Chinna Chennaiah, son of Mugenna aged about 45 years, r/o. Deebagunta village, Gospadu Mandal, Kurnool District ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree dt. 30/10/2015 passed in O.P.No. 153 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material the appeal and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant, and Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savithri Devi for the Respondent. papers in THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the appeal be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SAM vna HIGH COURT DATED:31/07/2025 DECREE 5 15 SEP 2025 H Current Section LAAS No. 43 of 2016 DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT I-. ■'t f \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI -V THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 38 OF 2016 APHC010598782016 Between: Special Deputy Collector-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal ...Appellant/Petitioner AND S Nadipi Kotaiah, S/o. Pullaiah, aged about 45 years, R/o. Maseedupuram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree dt.30/10/2015 passed in O.P.No. 142 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the appeal and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant, and Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savithri Devi for the Respondent. ! -j ■y / THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE AS FOLLOWS: f 1. That the appeal be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. / ‘t Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SAM Vna HIGH COURT DATED:31/07/2025 DECREE LAAS No. 38 of 2016 5 15 SEP 2025 s ^ . Current Section DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 69 OF 2016 APHC010386762016 m Between: Special Deputy Collector-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal ...Appellant/Petitioner AND N H P Shankar Reddy, S/o. Hanumanthu Reddy, Aged about 54 years R/o. Deebaguntia Village, Gospadu Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree dt. 30/10/2015 passed in O.P.No.96 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the appeal and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant, and Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savithri Devi for the Respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the appeal be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 'r SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SAM vna HIGH COURT DATED:31/07/2025 DECREE 15 SEP 2025 LAASNo. 69 of 2016 <3. Ji ^ , Current Section DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 59 OF 2016 APHCM 0822152016 Between: Special Deputy Collector-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal ...Appellant/Petitioner AND Mangali Venkata Swamy, Son of Pullanna, Aged about 55 years, R/o. Deebagunta Village, Gospadu Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894, against the Order and Decree dt. 30/10/2015 passed in O.P.No.140 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the appeal and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant, and Sri Balia Ravindranath & Ms K Savithri Devi for the Respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the appeal be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SAM vna r HIGH COURT DATED:31/07/2025 DECREE 15 SFP 2025 ^ . Current Section ^ LAAS No. 59 of 2016 OV O DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT