- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6901 WP No. 4559 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 4559 OF 2007 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. ATMARAM @ KISHORE S/O. VENKATESH NEVAGI AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O. HOUSE NO.9, SHRI. DAMODATHA HOUSING CO-OP SOCIETY, MADAGAON, GOA REP BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHRI. NARENDRA S/O. KALLAPPA HIROJI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. HARIHAR CHAWL, TILAKWADI, BELGAUM. 1a. DR. URMILA W/O. ATMARAM NEVAGI AGE: 69 YEARS, R/O: PADMA, MARGAO GOA STATE. 1b. DR. VENKATESH S/O. ATMARAM NEVAGI AGE: 39 YEARS, R/O.PADMA GOGOL, FATRODA, MARGOA, GOA STATE. 1c. SMT. DIKSHNA W/O. DATTARAJ KAMALAKAR AGE: 40 YEARS, R/O. PADMA GOGOL, FATRODA MARGAO, GOA STATE. …PETITIONERS Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6901 WP No. 4559 of 2007 (BY SRI. PRANAV S. KATAGERI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS AND CITY SURVEY, NORTH REGION, BELGAUM. 2. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, BELGAUM. 3. SHRI. DEVANAND PANDIT DAS JAGANNATHA DAS BRANCH PRESIDENT INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS, (ISKCON), TILAKWADI, BELGUAM. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. MRUTYINJAY TATA BANGI, ADVOCATE FOR R3) ------- THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT, DIRECTION OR ORDER IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING ANNEXURE-G, HEARING NO.REV/PHODI/SR-7/06-07, BELGAUM DATED 13.02.2007 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6901 WP No. 4559 of 2007 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for time. It is noticed that, none of the Annexures are original, certified, or authenticated documents. All the Annexures are only the typed copies. Moreover, the petition is of the year 2007. The matter is listed today finally as a last chance. In spite of that, learned counsel for the petitioners is not ready to address his arguments on merits. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (M.G.UMA) JUDGE VB CT:ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0