Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36629 (HP)

PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORPORATION LTD (PUNGRAIN) v. HIMACHAL PRADES MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL (HPMSEFC) AND ORS

CWP/15339/2025 · 2025-12-03

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:HHC:41788 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 15339 of 2025 a/w CWPs No. 15340, 16050, 16175 and 16822 of 2025 Decided on : 03.12.2025 1. CWP No. 15339 of 2025 Punjab State Grains Procurement Corporation Ltd. (PUNGRAIN) …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (HPMSEFC) and others …Respondents 2. CWP No. 15340 of 2025 Punjab State Grains Procurement Corporation Ltd. (PUNGRAIN) …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (HPMSEFC) and others …Respondents 3. CWP No. 16050 of 2025 Punjab State Grains Procurement Corporation Ltd. (PUNGRAIN) …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (HPMSEFC) and others …Respondents 2 2025:HHC:41788 4. CWP No. 16175 of 2025 Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. (PUNSUP) …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (HPMSEFC) and others …Respondents 5. CWP No. 16822 of 2025 The Punjab State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. (MARKFED) …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (HPMSEFC) and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Senior Advocate, with M/s Rupesh Kumar and Avnish Mandhotra, Advocates. For the respondents : Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Having heard learned Senior Counsel for the 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 3 2025:HHC:41788 petitioner(s) as also learned counsel for the respondents, these petitions, as prayed for, are allowed to be withdrawn and stand disposed of, with the observation that the petitioners can always take up the issue with regard to the jurisdiction before the learned Arbitrator and if such issue is raised before the learned Arbitrator, the same be decided by the learned Arbitrator at the first instance, after hearing both the parties, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge December 03, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)