Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36627 (JHR)

SATYAPRAKASH SINGH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./10089/2025 · 2025-12-12

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:37561 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10089 of 2025 ------ Satyaprakash Singh, aged about 53 years, Sex-Male, S/o –Late Rambihari Singh, R/o –Near Mahadeo Manda Mandir, Lower Chutia, Sahu Toli, Chutia, P.S. –Chutia, P.O. –Chutia, District –Ranchi, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Ruby Pandey, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.03 Dated- 12.12.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Lower Bazar P.S. Case No.112 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 406/420/467 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is the second journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail and earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 21.04.2025 in B.A. No. 3101 of 2025. It is next submitted that the fresh ground is that one of the prosecution witnesses has been examined and she has not supported the case of the prosecution and she was declared hostile and even though the prosecution put leading questions to her, still she did not support the case of the prosecution. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.07.2024, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 13 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Ranchi, in connection with Lower Bazar P.S. Case No.112 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 12.12.2025 Sonu/Gunjan-