ROHIT KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/18542/2025 · 2025-11-28
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36620 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36620 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP No. 18542/2025
Decided on: 28.11.2025
Rohit Kumar & Anr.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents.
……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners: Mr. Aasheesh Patial, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant
Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Notice. Mr. Rajat Choudhry, learned Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
3.
Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representations (Annexures P-8 to P-9) seeking applicability of Dinesh Kumar and Ors. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.2 in order to claim the relief for stepping-up of their pay at par with their juniors, have not been decided till date by the
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
2 CWP No.1747 of 2023, decided on 09.10.2023
2 respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Assistant Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
4.
Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners (Annexures P-8 to P-9) in accordance with law as well as taking into
consideration the above judgment in the case of Dinesh Kumar2 within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands
disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge 28th November, 2025(rohit)