1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8591 of 2025 1 - Tej Singh Dehari S/o Mr. Shriram Dehari Aged About 45 Years Post Lecturer Local Body, Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary Sulega Dhaudai, Block Narayanpur, Distt. Narayanpur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Public Instruction, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector And President District Rationalization Committee, Distt. Narayanpur Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Distt. Narayanpur Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer And Secretary District Level Rationalization Committee, Distt. Narayanpur Chhattisgarh 6 - Joint Director Education, Division Baster Jagdalpur Distt. Baster Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Panel Lawyer SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.08.20 10:27:09 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 19/08/2025 1. This is first round of litigation. The present writ petition filed by the petitioner against his transfer order dated 09.06.2025 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from High School Kalgaon, Block- Antagarh, Dist- Kanker to Govt. Higher Secondary School, Sulenga Dhaudai, Block- Narayanpur, Dist- Narayanpur under the rationalization instructions. The said transfer order was passed after declaring him surplus there. The petitioner has moved his representation on 13.06.2025 which is still pending. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Director, Public Instructions, vide notification 08.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 08.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 08.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted 3 under notification dated 08.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in an objective manner. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petitioner is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika