SHAKEELA NAZ v. STATE TH. SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT. AND ORS.
SWP/2434/2009 · 2025-04-22
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3661 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3661 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 2434/2009
Shakeela Naz
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
State of J&K & Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (22.04.2025)
01. The record reveals that the instant petition has come up before this Court after passing of the last order dated 31.12.2009, and during this intervening period, there was no effort on the part of the petitioner to get the instant petition listed.
02. Today also, when the instant petition was taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant petition. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s).
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
22.04.2025
Bunty
Serial No. 55 Bunty Kumar 2025.04.22 22:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document