SITA RAM SEN v. THE JODHPUR VIDHYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. (JVVNL)
CW/21257/2024 · 2025-01-10
Dinesh Mehta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36608 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36608 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JD:1687] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21257/2024 Sita Ram Sen S/o Gopi Lal Sen, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of Gram Ganeti, Tehsil Todaraisingh, District Tonk, (Raj.), And Petitioner Had Retired On 31.12.2022 Form The Post Of Helper-I. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (Jvvnl), Through Its Secretary (Admn.), Jodhpur Discom, New Power House, Jodhpur (Raj.).
2. The Zonal Chief Engineer (BMR-Z), Jodhpur Discom, Barmer, (Raj.).
3. The Deputy Secretary, JVVNL, Pension, Jodhpur, (Raj.).
4. The Account Officer (Pension), JVVNL, Jodhpur, (Raj.).
5. The Account Officer, JVVNL, Payment, Barmer (Raj.).
6. The Assistant Engineer, JVVNL, Sindhari, Barmer, (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.S. Sisodiya JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order 10/01/2025
1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied if the competent authority of the respondents are directed to expeditiously consider petitioner’s representation dated
21.05.2024.
2. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith photocopy of the earlier representation dated 21.05.2024 and certified copy of the
order instant within a period of four weeks from today.
[2025:RJ-JD:1687] (2 of 2) [CW-21257/2024]
3. In case representation is so addressed, the competent authority shall consider the same, in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks of receipt thereof.
4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner’s grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.
5. The stay application also stands disposed of, accordingly.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 15-Mak/-