Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36598 (JHR)

KUNDAN KUMAR CHOUBEY ALIAS KUNDAN CHOUBEY ALIAS KUNDAN CHOUBEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7107/2025 · 2025-12-12

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:37457] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7107 of 2025 Kundan Kumar Choubey @ Kundan Choubey @ Kundan Chobey, aged about 45 years, S/o Late Ramapati Choubey, resident of Village-Upchuria, P.O.-Poddardih, P.S.-Nirsa, District-Dhanbad. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocate. For the State : Mr. S.K. Mahto, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Prabhat Chandra Jha, Advocate. ------ 04/ 12.12.2025 Mr. Prabhash Chandra Jha, learned counsel submits that he has received vakalatnama on behalf of the informant, but the same has not been filed before the Registry, as the matter was listed on the Board. 2. In view of his such submission, let the said vakalatnama be taken on record. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 4. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Nirsa (MPL OP) P.S. Case No. 513 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2) and 109(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 25(1) of the Arms Act and Sections 341, 323 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and the informant are neighbours and relatives and even no injury has been received by the informant. He next submits that now the matter has been settled between the petitioner and the informant. [2025:JHHC:37457] -2- 6. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State submits that allegations are there of snatching the pistol. 7. Learned counsel appearing for the informant submits that now the matter has been settled between the parties and the informant does not want to proceed further in the matter. 8. In view of the above and considering that there is no injury and it has been pointed out that the petitioner is a retired army personnel and both the parties are relatives and now the matter has already been compromised, I am inclined to provide the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 9. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today, and in the event of her surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad, in connection with Nirsa (MPL OP) P.S. Case No. 513 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-12.12.2025 Amitesh/-