Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36591 (PNJ)

KHUSHI AND ANR v. STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS HOME SECRETARY AND ORS

CRWP/2786/2025 · 2025-03-20

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 146 KHUSHI AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of official respondents at the hands of respondent representation/application dated 18.03.2025 (Annexure P 2. At th submitted that the petitioner 18.03.2025 before the Sadar, Disrrict Sirsa ( the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to Superintendent the petitioners and take IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: KHUSHI AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Kunal Jain, Advocate for the Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 and 5 representation/application dated 18.03.2025 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on before the Superintendent of Police, Sadar, Disrrict Sirsa (Annexure P-5) raising their petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to of Police, Sirsa to decide the aforesaid representation filed by and take necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.2786 of 2025 Date of decision: 20.03.2025 …. Petitioners Versus …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to take action on their representation/application dated 18.03.2025 (Annexure P-5). e very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on of Police, District Sirsa and S.H.O. P.S. their grievances as mentioned in petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No. 2- decide the aforesaid representation filed by necessary action thereon. of the the s their has recently filed a representation on District Sirsa and S.H.O. P.S. in petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has s - decide the aforesaid representation filed by Jyoti 2025.03.24 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana Court, has accepted that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide and liberty. 20.03.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.2786 of 2025 Notice of motion. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 18.03.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.2786 of 2025 -2- Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana, who is present in the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the , without disposed the aforesaid within a accordance with , the official them adequate security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.03.24 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document