G. JOGA RAO v. M/s SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE COMPANY LTD.
WP227/619/2022 · 2025-04-07
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36588 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36588 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:16249
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 619 of 2022 • G. Joga Rao S/o Adinarayana Garu Aged About 45 Years R/o Qtr. No. 12/ A, Street-3, Sector-1, Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner Versus • M/s Shriram City Union Finance Company Ltd. A Registered Company Under The Company Act, Having Its Head Office At 221, Royapettah High Road, Mylapore, Chennai, Tamilnadu-600004, Through Shri Imran Khan, Legal Officer, Regional Office, A-3/6, First Floor, C.G. Elite Building, Opposite Mandi Gate, Vidhan Sabha Road, Pandri, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent For Petitioner : Ms. Priya Agrawal, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Punit Ruparel, Advocate For Respondent : None Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 07/04/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-
“10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the execution proceeding pending before the District Judge, Durg for execution of aforesaid arbitral award. 10.2 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the District Judge, Durg to decide the pending application filed under Section 34 of the Act, 1996 within stipulated time and till date the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay the further proceeding of execution of award dated 11.06.2012. 10.3 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s) / writ(s), order(s) in favour of the petitioner, which the Hon’ble Court deemed fit & just in the facts & circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs to the petitioner.” Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI
2
2. Ms. Priya Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the matter has already been settled between the parties, therefore, the petitioner does not want to pursue the matter.
3. Considering the submission made by Ms. Priya Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti