IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 147 SANJANA AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Ms. Ishita Negi Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance official respondents at the hands of respondent representation dated 18.03.2025 ( 2. At the very outs submitted that the petitioner 18.03.2025 before the their grievances as been considered and no action has that at this stage, the issued to respondent No. aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: SANJANA AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Ms. Ishita Negi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 11 representation dated 18.03.2025 (Annexure P-4). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on before the Superintendent of Police, grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the sam been considered and no action has been taken thereon. that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are respondent No. 2-Superintendent representation filed by the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.2760 of 2025 Date of decision: 20.03.2025 …. Petitioners …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA petitioners. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to take action on their 4). et, learned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on of Police, Jind (Annexure P-4) raising petition but the same has not yet been taken thereon. He further submitted satisfied if appropriate directions are of Police, Jind to decide the representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action of the the s their has recently filed a representation on raising e has not yet further submitted satisfied if appropriate directions are decide the necessary action Jyoti 2025.03.24 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent that the needful paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. Needless to respondents would provide and liberty. 20.03.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.2760 of 2025 Notice of motion. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 18.03.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.2760 of 2025 -2- Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana, who is present in accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-4) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in State and submits will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the , without posed the aforesaid within a accordance with , the official them adequate security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.03.24 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document