-1- 2025:CGHC:14051 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3294 of 2019 Poonaram Pathak S/o Shri Ram Khelavan Pathak Aged About 48 Years Sarpanch, Village Panchayat - Basni, Block Development - Bemetara, Distt. Bemetara Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector Distt. Bemetara, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Executive officer Zila Panchayat, Bemetara, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Dy. Director Panchayat And Social Services, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Chief Executive officer Janpad Panchayat, Bemetara, Distt. Bemetara, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Sub Divisional officer Bemetara, Distt. Bemetara, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Pratibha Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amit Sahu, Advocate For State : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- 24.03.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 31.03.2019 passed by the Collector District Bemetara under the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993, is revisable before the Divisional Commissioner according to the provisions of Rule 3 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995. She would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to prefer a revision before the said authority, and in turn, the authorities concerned may be directed to decide it expeditiously. 2) No objection from the other side. 3) Permission granted. 4) Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. 5) If the petitioner prefers a revision before the Divisional Commissioner according to the provisions of Rule 3 of Chhattisgarh Panchayat (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995, it is expected that the authority concerned will decide it expeditiously strictly in accordance with law. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim