Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:36337
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWPOA No.916 of 2019 Decided on : 30.10.2025 __________________________________________________________
Ashish Kumar
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and another ....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the petitioner: Ms. Vandana Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge
Ms. Vandana Kumari, Learned Counsel, on the Instructions of Learned Original Counsel, Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, states that the petitioner does not intend to continue with the present proceedings and, therefore, the proceedings may be given a closure. [Statement is taken on record]
2.
Prayer being innocuous, is not opposed.
3.
Accordingly, in terms of the Statement of
Learned Counsel for petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms and all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2025:HHC:36337
disposed of.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge October 30, 2025
[Bhardwaj]