1 2025:CGHC:35775 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8470 of 2025 1 - Vijaynath Patel S/o Jagdish Prasad Patel, Aged About 60 Years Working As Teacher And Posted At Govt. Middle School, Jhilmila, Block Saraipali, District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Director, Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Public Institution, Third Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Chairman/ Division Joint Director, Education Department, Rationalization Resolution Committee, Integrated Education Building, First Floor, Pension Bada, Division Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Collector, District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) 5 - District Education Officer And Secretary District Level Rationalization Committee, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) 6 - Block Education Officer, Block- Saraipali, Dist. Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) 7 - Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary/ Middle School, Jhilmila, Block- Saraipali, District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harishankar Patel, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.07.25 12:32:00 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 24/07/2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his/her transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of with liberty to move fresh representation, if already not made, and in turn the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted 3 under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika