Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RSA-2341-1998 211
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2341-1998 Date of Decision :-24.03.2025 Tulsi Ram .......Appellant Versus Risala .......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: None **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL)
1. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Similar was the position on the previous occasion. As per office report, notice issued to the appellant has been received back unserved with the report
“incomplete address”. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal.
2. Dismissed in default for want of prosecution. 24.03.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) Brij JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No BRIJ MOHAN 2025.03.25 11:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh