Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3656 (CHH)

Dr. Raj Shekhar Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

WPS/3007/2016 · 2025-07-06

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (WPS No. 3007 of 2016 & WPS No. 7225 of 2018) 2025:CGHC:30985 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3007 of 2016 1 - Dr. Raj Shekhar Pandey S/o Late Shri Narottam Lal Pandey, Aged About 61 Years R/o Behind Kankali Hospital Complex, Brahmanpara, P. S. Azad Chowk Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Dr. Sachin Kumar L. Baghel, S/o. Shri Lalit Kishor M. Baghel, Aged About 47 Years R/o New Dnyaneshwar Nagar, Manewada Road, Post Reader, P. S. Ajui, Nagpur 440027 Maharashtra, District : Nagpur, Maharashtra 3 - Dr. Hiraman Banjare, S/o Shri Sonchand Banjare, Aged About 54 Years R/o F. I. E. A. C. Colony Raipur, P. S. Civil Lines, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Directoarte Of Indian Medicinal System And Homeopathy, Through Its Director Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Union Of India Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare Department Of Ayurved Yoga And Naturopathy Unnal Siddha And Homeopathy A Y U S H Through Its Secretary, Indian Red Cross Society, Annexe Building 1, Red Cross Road New Delhi 110001, District : New Delhi, Delhi ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2025.07.08 16:00:20 +0530 2 (WPS No. 3007 of 2016 & WPS No. 7225 of 2018) 4 - Admission And Fee Regulatory Committee, Through Its Chairman, Directorate Of Technical Education Near Girls Polytechnic College, Bairan Bazaar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Chhattisgarh Ayurved Medical College, Rajnandgaon Through Its Principal, G. E. Road, Manki, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 6 - Ayurvigyan Shikshan Samiti, Through Its Secretary, G. E. Road, Manki, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 7 - Central Council Of Indian Medicine Through Its Secretary Institutional Area Janakpuri New Delhi 110058, District : New Delhi, Delhi --- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) For Petitioner :- Ms. Ruchi Nagar, Advocate For State :- Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer For Respondent Nos.3 & 7 :- Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, CGC For Respondent Nos.5 & 6 :- Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate WPS No. 7225 of 2018 1 - Dr. Sujeet Kumar Dalai S/o Shri Hadibandhu Dalari Aged About 44 Years R/o Gopabandhu Lane, Near Mukteshwar Temple, Sarwagya Nagar, P.S. Kumbharpada, Puri, District- Puri, Odisha ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Directorate Indian Medicinal System And Homeopathy Through Its Director, Mantralaya, Mahanadi-Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Union Of India Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare Department Of Ayurved Yoga And Naturopathy Unnal Sinddha 3 (WPS No. 3007 of 2016 & WPS No. 7225 of 2018) And Homeopathy (Ayush), Through Its Secretary Indian Red Cross Society, Annexe- Building, Red Cross Road, New Delhi. 110001 4 - Admission And Fee Fegulatory Committee Through Its Chairman Directorate Of Technical Education Near Girls Polytechnic College Bairan Bazaar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Chhattisgarh Ayurved Medical College Rajnandgaon, Through Its Principal G.F. Road, Manki, Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 6 - Ayurvigyan Shikshan Samiti Through Its Secretary G.E. Road, Manki Ranjandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) For Petitioner :- Ms. Ruchi Nagar, Advocate For State :- Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.3 :- Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, CGC SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 07.07.2025 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have made representations before the respondent authority for payment of salary arrears, which have not been considered and decided till date. 3. Be that as it may, respondent Nos.5 & 6/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the said representations of the petitioners on its own merit strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and 4 (WPS No. 3007 of 2016 & WPS No. 7225 of 2018) speaking order within six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, both the writ petitions stand finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!