APHC010599752024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31323/2024 Between: 1. T SARATH, S/O. T.MUNIRAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 4-87, C-4, SAI NAGAR, TIRUPATI RURAL, MURALI RAOS JUNIOR COLLEGE, YOGIMALLVARAM, TIRUCHANOOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. T.KISHORE,, S/O. T.MUNIRAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 4-87, C-4, SAI NAGAR, TIRUPATI RURAL, MURALI RAOS JUNIOR COLLEGE, YOGIMALLVARAM, TIRUCHANOOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GIMTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI. 4. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, M.R PALLI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, M.R PALLI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly respondents 4 and 5 in continuing the Rowdy Sheet opened against the petitioners on the rolls of 5th Respondent in spite of petitioners are acquittal in Session Case No.412 of 2010 by calendar and Judgment dated 27.01.2011 on the file of the Principal Assistant Session Judge, Tirupati and 5th respondent in insisting petitioners to repeatedly appear before their authority once in every week under the guise of keeping petitioners movements under close watch, without there being any authority of law, without jurisdiction and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and un just, and violative of Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Orders and offends articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to remove the said Rowdy Sheet opened against the petitioners on the rolls of the 5th respondent and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MUCHAKAYALA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly respondents 4 and 5 in continuing the Rowdy Sheet opened against the petitioners on the rolls of 5th Respondent in spite of petitioners are acquittal in Session Case No.412 of 2010 by calendar and Judgment dated 27.01.2011 on the file of the Principal Assistant Session Judge, Tirupati and 5th respondent in insisting petitioners to repeatedly appear before their authority once in every week under the guise of keeping petitioners movements under close watch, without there being any authority of law, without jurisdiction and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and un just, and violative of Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Orders and offends articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to remove the said Rowdy Sheet opened against the petitioners on the rolls of the 5th respondent and pass such...…” 2. Heard Sri M.Narayana, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 21.08.2025 MH HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.31323 of 2024 Dated.21.08.2025 MH