Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.14883 of 2025 1) Harihrisna Sahu ..... Petitioners 2) Suresh Kumar Nayak 3) Sunil Kumar Sahu 4) Sunil Kumar Sahu 5) Ram Chandra Sahu 6) Anduru Bikram Reddy@ A Bikram Reddy Represented By Adv. - Bijaya Kumar Behera 1 -versus- 1) State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties 2) The Sub Collector, Berhampur 3) The Tahasildar, Kanisi 4) The Revenue Inspector(r.i) , Gopalpur 5) P Satyanarayan Prasad Represented By Adv. – Mr. T. Kumar, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA ORDER 18.06.2025 Order No. 1. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned ASC for the State. 3. Upon hearing from the learned counsels of both the sides, it is felt proper to dispose of the writ petition finally at this stage giving liberty to the petitioners to prefer an Appeal against the Order of rejection of their mutation application vide Mutation Case No.4505 of 2024 by the Tahasildar, Konisi and in case of filing of an Page 2 of 2. Appeal before the Sub-Collector, Berhampur challenging the order of Rejection of their Mutation Case, the Sub-Collector, Berhampur shall entertain the appeal without questioning the delay by invoking the provision under Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963, because the petitioners have bonafidely approached the wrong forum i.e. the writ Court and shall dispose of that Mutation Appeal as expeditiously as possible as per law. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of finally. 5. Urgent certified copy of this Order be granted to the petitioners on proper application. ( ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) Judge Rati Ranjan NAYAK Cuttack, India.