KUNDAN KUMAR ALIAS KUNDAN GHATWAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1630/2025 · 2025-03-17
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3655 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3655 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.1630 of 2025
------ Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Ghatwar, s/o Rangu Ghatwar aged about 24 years, r/o Budh Bazar, Sirka, PO Argada & PS Ramgarh, Dist. Ramgarh
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : M/s.Vishnu Prabhakar Pathak & Apurva, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, APP
------
Order No.02 Dated- 17-03-2025 Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.181 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(2), 303(2) & 352 of BNS 2023, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to murder Akbar Khan. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that there was a free fight between the parties. It is next submitted that for the selfsame occurrence mother of the petitioner has lodged Ramgarh P. S Case No.184 of 2024. It is also submitted that petitioner has no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the victim fell down while fleeing away after assaulting the mother of the informant and sustained the injury. It is next submitted that the alleged victim was in fact demanding extortion of Rs.5,00,000/-. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security and he further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest
-2- or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramgarh in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.181 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anjali/