Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36548 (ALL)

SMT REKHA RANI @ RADHA SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/726/2025 · 2025-04-07

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:50536 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 726 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt Rekha Rani @ Radha Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sukrampal,Tikendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Complaint Case No. 431 of 2018, under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC Police Station- Kosikalan, District-Mathura pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Chata, Mathura expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the informant in the case and same is pending since 2018. It is also submitted that the opposite party no.2 is not cooperating with the Court concerned and are adopting delaying tactics in disposal of the said case and only dates are being fixed in the matter. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said session trial. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. It reveals from the perusal of the record that the accused has appeared before the Court and he has been granted bail by the Court concerned and now the matter is fixed for recording the evidence. The applicant before this Court is the informant of the case and since the case is fixed for evidence, normally it starts with the deposition of P.W.1/ informant, but it is surprising that instead of producing her evidence before the Court, she has knocked at the door of this Court seeking relief for expeditious disposal of the case. 7. In the circumstances, no relief is granted in this matter because it is she, who has to appear before the Court as first witness. 8. There is no need to pass any order in this matter. 9. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad