NHAI Vs. Arjun OMP(M) No.315/2024 30.12.2025 Present: Ms. Shrishti, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for the respondent. OMP(M) No. 346 & 347/2025 Learned counsel appearing for the legal representatives of the sole respondent has no objection for allowing the applications. Accordingly, both the applications are allowed in terms of the prayer clause. Consequently, the legal representatives of deceased respondent, mentioned in para-3 of OMP(M) No. 346/2025, are ordered to be brought on record as respondents No.(i) to (iii). Amended memo of parties be filed within two weeks. Registry to carry out necessary corrections in the cause title. Applications are disposed of. OMP(M) No. 315/2024 Learned counsel for respondents No. (i) to (iii) has no objection to the condonation of delay in filing the main appeal. Even otherwise, the delay has been cogently explained in the application. Hence, for the aforesaid reasons, the application is allowed. The delay in instituting the main appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Arb. Appeal No.________/2025 Be registered. List for consideration after six weeks. OMP(M) No.______/2025 (OMPST No. 38251/2024) Be registered. Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire awarded amount alongwith up-to-date interest in the Registry of this Court within a period of six weeks from today, the execution and operation of the impugned order dated 15.12.2023 passed by the learned District Judge Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P. in Arbitration No. 33 of 2019 (National Highway Authority of India Vs. Arjun.) shall remain stayed. Parties are, however, at liberty to seek modification/alteration of the order. Application to stand disposed of. OMP No.1188/2025 The application is disposed of with a direction to the applicant to file translated copy of the documents in issue before the next date of hearing. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 30th December, 2025 (Rohit)