IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2197 OF 2012 Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to summon the respondent herein and punish him for intentional disobedience of the interim order dated 22.09.2012 in W.P.No.25837 of 2011. Between: 1. Dr.Arcot Vasantha Rao Usha, W/o.U.G.Krikshnam Raju, R/o at USA, rep. by their G.P.A.Holder Rudraraju Rama Eswara Bangra Raju D.No.49-54-15/3, S/o.Venkata Rama Raju, Aged 59 years, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam 2. Dr.Uddaraju Gopala Krishnam Raju, S/o.Chitti Raju, R/o at USA, rep. by their G.P.A.Holder Rudraraju Rama Eswara Bangra Raju, S/o.Venkata Rama Raju, Aged 59 years, D.No.49-54-15/3, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam ...PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS AND 1. J.Durga Ravindranath, Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal * Visakhapatnam District. ^ A.- ...RESPONDENT/4^" RESPONDENT IN WP 2., Sri Paul Kiran, Tahsildar Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District R2 is Suo-moto impleaded as per Court Order dated 02 04 2025 vide in CC No 2197 of 2012. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: ^ ■ APHC010507522022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2197/2012 Between: Dr.Arcot Vasantha Rao Usha, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND J DLipa Ravindranath and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1 .V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: The above contempt case is filed complaining of non-implementati on of the order dated 22.09.2012 in W.P.No.25837 of 2011. ...CONTEMNOR(S) 2. The petitioner filed the above writ petition to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner’s representation for the grant of patteidar passbooks and title deeds in respect of Ac. 1-30 cents of land in survey No. 1/1 and Ac. 00-58 cents in survey No.3/1, Rushikonda village, Madhurawada Mandal, as illegal and arbitrary. The said writ petition was disposed of on 22.09.2012, directing respondent No.4, Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam, to consider the petitioner’s representation and pass appropriate orders. 3. Heard Sri A. Vamsi Krishna, learned counsel representing Sri V. Surya Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Bhagat Singh, learned counsel for the respondent. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it was pleaded that the respondent/contemnor failed to consider the petitioner’s representation and pass appropriate orders. 5. Sri Bhagat Singh, learned counsel for the respondent submitted the instructions furnished by Tahsildar vide Rc.No.1069/2011/A dated 07.05.2025, a perusal of which indicates that in pursuance of order dated 22.09.2012, the then Tahsildar passed a speaking order vide Lr.RC.No.1069/2011/A , dated 28.01.2013, rejecting the claim of the petitioners and against the said tTder, the petitioners filed appeal before the appellate authority and RDO, Visakhapatnam vide D.Dis.No.4153/2014/C. 6. Thus, as seen from the instructions, a speaking order was passed by the Tahsidair on 28.01.2013. 7. Given the instructions, since the respondents complied with the order dated 22.09.2012, by passing a speaking order, though some delay occurred, in the considered opinion of this court, the respondents did not commit any contempt by not implementing the order dated 22.09.2012 in W.P.No.25837 of 2011. 8. Therefore, this contempt case is closed. No costs. 9. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY registrar \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. J.Durga Ravindranath, Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 2. Sri Paul Kiran, Tahsildar Visakhapatnam Rural Visakhapatnam District 3. One CC to Sri. V Surya Kiran Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies vna f ■ HIGH COURT DATED:07/05/2025 ORDER CC.No.2197 of 2012 t 0 5 AUG 20?5 vV^ O; 03 ' Sectitjjx^y^ CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS