( 2025:JHHC:38214 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 321 of 2024 Madan Ram, son of Late Jhari Ram Rawani, aged about 66 years, resident of Village- Pagru, P.O. & P.S.- Hatia, District- Ranchi. …. Plaintiff / Petitioner Versus 1. Anand Singh, son of Late Ganesh Singh, resident of Village- Tamar, P.O. & P.S.- Tamar, District- Ranchi. 2. Smt. Asha Toppo, wife of Late Budhu Oraon; 3. Deewakar Oraon; 4. Prabhakar Oraon; both sons of Late Budhu Oraon. 5. Puja Kumari, daughter of Late Budhu Oraon; 6. Govind Mahto, son of Late Chhotu Mahto; all resident of Village- Tamar, P.O. & P.S.- Tamar, District- Ranchi. 7. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, P.O.- GPO, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Ranchi. …. Defendants / Opp. Parties 8. Kallu Ram Rawani, son of Late Jairam Rawani, resident of Village- Tamar, P.O. & P.S.- Tamar, District- Ranchi. …. Proforma Defendant / Proforma Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the State : Mr. K.K. Bhath, AC to SC-I For the Pvt. O.P. : Mr. K.K. Ojha, Advocate ----- 9/ 19.12.2025 Heard the parties. 2. This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed for quashing of the order dated 20.02.2024 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)- XXI, Ranchi, in Misc. Civil Application No. 608 of 2023 in Original Suit No. 1045 of 2019, whereby the learned Court has rejected the application filed by the plaintiff / petitioner under Order-I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for impleading Dayanand Singh and Md. Nizamuddin, as defendants in the original suit. 3. It was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that said Dayanand Singh and Md. Nizamuddin, whom the defendant/petitioner wants to implead them in the original suit, are possessing the land, adjacent to the suit property. It was further submitted that they are encroaching the land of the plaintiff and as such, the suit which has been filed by the plaintiff for declaration of his right, title and interest can only be determined, if they also made party in this case. 4. In order to prevent the multifariousness of the suit, it will be proper that both the persons be implead as party in the Original Suit No. 1045 of 2019. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts, the impugned order dated 20.02.2024 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)-XXI, Ranchi, in Misc. Civil Application No. 608 of 2023 in Original Suit No. 1045 of 2019 is, hereby, set aside. Leaned Court is directed to hear the application filed by the plaintiff / petitioner under Order-I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure afresh and pass the order in view of the aforesaid direction. 6. This civil miscellaneous petition is allowed. (Ambuj Nath, J.) R.Kr. 19.12.2025 Uploaded on 20.12.2025