Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No.225/2024
Rajesh Kapoor ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Aseem Sawhney, Advocate
V/s
Mohd. Sadeeq ….Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 14.05.2025
1. By this petition, the petitioner has alleged non-compliance and willful disobedience of order dated 22.12.2023 passed in CRM(M) No.1078/2023 titled Vinod Kumar v. UT of J&K and others, whereby the Investigating Officer was directed to investigate the matter. However, it was provided that the challan shall not be presented without seeking prior permission of this Court. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Investigating Officer had filed the final closure report before the learned Sub Judge, Jammu without seeking prior permission of this Court.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the proceedings in CRM(M) No.1078/2023, which was filed by one Vinod Kumar challenging the FIR No.174/2022 registered on the complaint of the petitioner, already stand closed vide order dated 24.05.2024.
3. Compliance report stands filed, wherein it is stated that inadvertently the closure report of the case was presented before the Court, however, the same stands withdrawn. Sr. No. 77
2
4. In view of the compliance report, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press the instant petition. Accordingly, proceedings in this petition are closed. However, the Investigating Officer shall proceed with the investigation and produce the final report.
Jammu: 14.05.2025 Vinod
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
Vinod Kumar 2025.05.15 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document