Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3653 (UTT)

MANISH RAMRAJ YADAV v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/103/2023 · 2025-04-05

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2554 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 05TH APRIL, 2025 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.103 OF 2023 Manish Ramraj Yadav ..... Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand through Secretary, Home, Dehradun ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Rajat Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Gopal K Verma, Advocate through video conferencing. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Additional Advocate General. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. The present Application has been filed by the applicant – Manish Ramraj Yadav seeking anticipatory bail under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in Case Crime No.354 of 2022, registered at Police Station Nehru Colony, District Dehradun. 2. Heard Mr. Rajat Joshi, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Gopal K Verma, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General for the State. 2025:UHC:2554 2 3. Learned counsel for the State submitted on instructions, received from the investigating officer, that the applicant Manish Ramraj Yadav has been exonerated during the course of the investigation. The investigation has already been completed. 4. After the said submission, Mr. Rajat Joshi, Advocate, appearing for the applicant, has requested to dispose of the present anticipatory bail application. 5. The present Anticipatory Bail Application (ABA No.103 of 2023) is disposed of accordingly. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Date:05.04.2025 Pant/